Skip to content
Your rights

Lux Solar faces investigation over customers' delayed battery installations

Queensland's consumer watchdog is investigating Lux Solar, ABC News reports, after customers described paying deposits and waiting about a year for their home batteries.

SolarAnswers editors4 min read

Lux Solar website screenshot published by ABC News, showing membership wording questioned in its investigation

Lux Solar's website as pictured in ABC's investigation. The membership wording shown was questioned in the report. Image reproduced from: ABC News, Lux Solar investigated by watchdog as consumers say they were ripped off. Credit: Supplied, as credited by ABC News.

Paying for a battery reserves more than equipment. A household is also relying on a business to arrange an installer, finish the work and explain what happens if the promised timetable slips. The Lux Solar complaints show how damaging a long wait can become when those arrangements remain unresolved.

This article draws on Michael Atkin's ABC News investigation, published 14 October 2026, the NETCC's public register and consumer regulators' guidance. The customer accounts are ABC's reporting; the contract analysis below is SolarAnswers' own.

The customers waiting for installation

ABC reported that Perth customer Bob Emery paid a $1,000 deposit in October 2025 for a 48 kWh system. A November estimate put installation two to four weeks away. He later sought a refund and was still waiting about a year after paying.

Brisbane customer Justin Albin also described a year-long wait. He rejected a refund offer because replacing the deal would mean a lower rebate and lost expected benefits. A revised proposal involved five batteries instead of three and changes to timber boards at his home.

Queensland's Office of Fair Trading confirmed an investigation to ABC. The broadcaster also reported that Lux Solar continued displaying approved-seller wording after removal from the industry code. Lux Solar did not respond to ABC's interview request and written questions before publication. That is the response status in the original report, not evidence of an admission. Read ABC's investigation.

The code register provides a separate, dated record

The NETCC compliance register lists Lux Solar Pty Ltd as expelled on 30 June 2026. Its published entries identify failures to carry out warranty repairs or replacements within a reasonable timeframe and to cooperate with the code administrator's investigation.

The register establishes the code action and its date. It does not decide each customer's entitlement to a refund or compensation. Buyers should check current membership directly, using the business name on the contract, rather than rely on a logo in an advertisement.

Why a changed battery proposal needs a fresh review

Changing the number of units can alter the physical installation even when a sales proposal presents it as an equivalent replacement. The useful comparison is a written, line-by-line one: model numbers, usable capacity, inverter compatibility, mounting position, building work, warranty and final price.

For a customer already waiting, those questions can feel like starting again. But agreeing to an unclear variation can make it harder to identify what the installer is now promising. Ask for a revised drawing and an explanation of who pays for any additional preparation. Keep the earlier quote alongside it so changes remain visible.

A refund offer also answers only one part of a dispute. A customer may additionally be arguing about delay, expenses or lost benefits. Whether those losses are recoverable depends on the circumstances and evidence; expected savings in a sales estimate are not automatically an amount owed.

What the regulator says about taking payment

The ACCC's guidance on paid-for products and services says businesses must not accept money when they do not intend to supply, intend to supply something materially different, or know or should know they cannot deliver by the promised date or within a reasonable time.

A delay alone does not establish a breach. Unexpected events can affect supply. The ACCC says businesses should give clear information about availability, likely timing and the solutions available, and proactively update affected customers. The appropriate remedy can depend on the reason for the delay and the agreement.

The ACCC uses reports to inform enforcement but does not resolve individual delayed-supply disputes. These general rules explain the issues a complaint may raise; they do not establish that Lux Solar breached them in a particular contract.

The paperwork that makes a complaint understandable

Consumer Protection WA's solar guidance recommends clear start and completion dates and receipts for deposits. It also explains that consumer guarantees apply to the products and the installation service, including care and skill and completion within a reasonable time.

For an unresolved order, organise the records into a simple chronology:

  • The date and version of the accepted quote, including the contracting company's name.
  • The payment date, receipt and amount, with any stated purpose for the deposit.
  • Each promised installation date, cancellation and explanation received.
  • Your requested outcome and the business's written response.
  • Any revised equipment proposal, refund offer or completed work.

Attach the relevant documents rather than relying on a long account of unanswered calls. Ask the business for a specific written response to the outstanding issues. State consumer agencies can advise on the available complaint route for your circumstances; a news article cannot determine the outcome of that process.

Delivery claims deserve the same scrutiny as battery specifications

The ACCC's solar supplier guidance says claims about availability and installation need a reasonable basis. Suppliers must also avoid misleading statements about savings, rebate eligibility and installer qualifications, and must not omit potential delays that affect a buying decision.

For a new quote, ask what supports the proposed date: allocated stock, an identified installation team, a completed site assessment and any required approvals. A written answer is easier to compare with later events than a reassurance that a booking is coming soon.

What is still unknown

The investigation and individual accounts should not be described as a court finding of fraud. This article does not establish that all outstanding Lux Solar orders remain unresolved, or that the customers identified by ABC have since received installations or refunds. A confirmed resolution would require fresh evidence from the parties or an official decision. The records linked here were checked on 15 October 2026.

Your rights
Share

Written by the SolarAnswers editors

We link the reporting, government, industry or manufacturer sources behind each story below, and distinguish reported claims from our own analysis. We do not sell equipment, and no installer or brand pays to be written about. How we are paid

Comments

If comments do not appear, reload this page or browse the community.

Keep reading

All posts

Want quotes that show every rebate as its own line?